|
Instructor |
Michael R. Chial, Ph.D. |
||
|
Contact |
Email: mrchial@facstaff.wisc.edu
|
||
|
Telephone |
262-3951 (Goodnight Hall--messages) |
||
|
Course Meetings |
2:30-4:10 Mondays via Video Teleconference |
Fast Finder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updated 30 January 2006

This course seeks to acquaint students with the effects of noise on people, and with occupational hearing conservation. The format for the first half of the course will be lecture, discussion, and demonstration, the focus of which will be the theoretical, legal and applied aspects of industrial/occupational hearing conservation. The remainder of the course will center on presentations by students on specific topics dealing with the effects of noise on people, and current issues in occupational hearing conservation. See below for content outline.
This on-line syllabus will be updated periodically. The date of the most recent revision appears above. You are encourged to print a copy at the beginning of the semester, and to return to this site from time to time to check for revisions.
PREREQUISITES
Com. Dis. 835, 850, 852, 853, 854, and 855.
REFERENCES
The following two references are required. The first is the standard in the field and should be ordered directly from the publisher as suggested via Email. The NIOSH document is available online (both as a Web page and as a pdf document) at no cost and contains an excellent glossary of terms.
Berger, E.H., Royster, L.H., Royster, J.D., Driscoll, D.P. and Layne, M., Editors. (2001). The Noise Manual, 5th Ed.. San Diego, CA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.NIOSH (1998). Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure-Revised Criteria 1998. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH. (See below for downloads.)
Also see
CD 833 folder Slipsheet (download pdf from here).
Chial, M. (1998). Hearing Impairment Calculation Excel Spreadsheet (download from here).
Chial, M. (2002). Basic Rules for Survey and Field Sound Level Measurement (download pdf from here).
Chial, M. (2002). Poor Man's Tour of Hearing Protection Devices (download pdf from here).
Chial, M. (2005). Short Glosssary of Terms in Occupational Audiology (download pdf from here).
Chial, M. (2005). Hearing Conservation Rule (download pdf of PowerPoint from here).
Chial, M. (2005). Hearing Conservation Rule Summary (download pdf from here).
Chial, M. (undated). If Pigs Could Fly (download pdf of PowerPoint from here).
Chial, M. (2004). Audiologist as Expert Witness (download pdf of PowerPoint from here).
In addition, selected tutorial or summary papers appearing
in the primary literature and several ANSI
standards will be assigned. These will be made available as handouts or pdf documents.
Much relevant background and regulatory literature in this area is available on the Internet. Several of the Web sites noted below will be assigned. You are strongly encouraged to consult each of them. Simply point, click and bookmark.
- Acoustics FAQs (Campanella Associates)
- Audiometrics, Inc.
- Active Noise Control FAQs
- American Industrial Hygiene Association Home
- ANSI Standards in Acoustics, Bioacoustics and Noise
- ASHA: The Audiologist's Role in Occupational and Environmenta Hearing Conservation (pdf)
- Bruel and Kjaer
- Cabot Safety Corporation- EAR
- Technical Library (searchable)
- EARLogs (in Web and PDF formats)
- CAOHC Home
- Center for Disease Control Home
- Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): 1910.95-Occupational Noise Exposure
- Hearing Education and Awareness for Rockers
- Industrial Acoustics Corporation
- Industrial Noise Control, Inc.
- Institute of Noise Control Engineering
- James, Anderson and Associates (consulting engineers)
- Kavanagh's Hearing Handicap Calculator (and much more)
- Larson-Davis Instruments
- League for the Hard of Hearing
- Metrosonics, Inc.
- NHCA
- NIH Combined Health Information Database (search site)
- NIOSH Home
- NIOSH Revised Criteria (1998) (in Web format)
- NIOSH Revised Criteria (1998) (in pdf format)
- NIOSH Noise and Hearing Loss Prevention
- NIOSH Hearing Protector Device Compendium (searchable)
- NIOSH Noise meter (simulation)
- NIOSH FAQs About Noise and Hearing Loss
- NIOSH Evaluation of Hearing Conservation Programs (PowerPoint & Flash)
- NIOSH Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation Checklist
- NORA: Disease and Injury Priority Research Areas
- OSHA Home
- Noise Pollution Clearing House
- Quest Technologies
- Sound Seal, Inc.
- Technical Manual for OSHA Inspectors (Chapter 5: Noise)
- Wisconsin Worker's Compensation Manual (see section DWD 80.25)
And to see if you're paying attention,
These will be of tremendous help in identifying print sources for your presentations and term papers.
- Pub Med (National Library of Medicine)
- EBSCO (via UW-Madison Library from off campus)
- Federal Government (FirstGov)
- Google Scholar
FORENSICS SITES
|
Assignment or Task |
Points |
Percentage of Course Grade |
|---|---|---|
|
Consistent attendance and active participation in class discussion that suggests assigned material has been read. This may include short written assignments. |
|
|
|
Completion of one homework assignment dealing with estimation of hearing handicap. Must be submitted as email attachment (as Word document or as a pdf file). |
|
|
Completion of two laboratory projects. For one of these, data will be collected as a group activity; for both, reports are to be prepared by students individually--see separate evaluation guides. Must be submitted as email attachment (as Word document or as a pdf file). |
|
|
Preparation and oral presentation on a relevant topic of interest to you. Topics must be approved by instructor. Each presentation will be allowed 20 minutes. Students must use use PowerPoint (or something similar) for this activity. Presentations must be submitted for duplication on CDs, copies of which will be provided to class members. See separate instructions, tips and evaluation guide. |
|
|
|
Completion of written take-home exam. See separate instructions and evaluation guide. Must be submitted as email attachment (as Word document or as a pdf file). |
|
|
|
Letter Grade |
Percentage of |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Late work may result in reduced grades. A score of 0 (zero) will be assigned for work not submitted.
Assignment
|
Evaluation Form
|
Attachment Code |
HW |
||
Lab 1: Calculation of Noise Exposure, Loudness and Loudness Level |
L1 |
|
Lab 2: Meaurement of Classroom Ambient Noise and Reverberation Time ANSI S12.60-2002 American National Standard Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guildelines for Schools. (Get it free here.) |
Here |
L2 |
PR |
||
FE |
NOTE: Submitt assignments as Email attachments to the instructor as Word or pdf files. You MUST use the following convention for the name of files you send: XYZ833??.doc (for a Word File) XYZ833??.pdf (for a pdf file), where XYZ are your intials, and where ?? is replaced with the appropriate two-character attachment code from the table above.
SUGGESTED TOPICS FOR PRESENTATIONS
See the attached list of selected sources (below) as a place to begin a literature search. Also, consult material available from the Noise Pollution Clearing House and literature citations in the course textsbooks. Use the other Web sites noted above to identify additional current scientific and technical literature.
Other topics are possible and acceptable. Please discuss your ideas with the instructor.
- Annoyance and Noise
- Auditory Requirements for Employment in Public Safety Careers
- Characteristics of Community Noise Control Ordinances
- Community Noise Issues
- Comparison of Occupational Hearing Conservation Programs in Other Nations
- Comparison of State Worker's Compensation Plans for Hearing Loss
- Damage-Risk Criteria and Impulse Noise
- Effects of Noise on the Academic Performance of Children
- Effects of the Acoustic Reflex on TTS and NIPTS
- Effects of Impulsive Noise on NIPTS
- Effects on Noise on Sleep
- Evaluation of Occupational Hearing Conservation Programs
- Extra-Auditory Effects of Noise
- Factors Affecting Individual Susceptibility to NIPTS
- Issues in the Calculation of Hearing Handicap (Impairment)
- Hearing Loss Associated With Specific Occupational Groups
- Hearing Loss from Non-Occupational Noise Exposure: Music
- Hearing Loss from Non-Occupational Noise Exposure: Weapons
- Hearing Loss from Non-Occupational Noise Exposure: Vehicles
- Methods for Predicting the Effects on Noise on Speech Communication
- Military Hearing Conservation Programs
- Noise Dosimetry vs. Area Monitoring and Time-Work Exposure Monitoring
- Performance of Passive Personal Hearing Protection Devices
- Performance of Active Noise-Reduction Personal Hearing Protection Devices
- Physiologic Mechanisms of NIPTS
- Synergistic Effects of Exercise and Noise Exposure
- Synergistic Effects of Noise and Pharmacologic Agents
- Work-Performance and Noise
These topics will be covered during the first portion of the course, although not necessarily in the order shown.
NOTE: in the following, chapter numbers from the Berger, et al text are designated by T (for text), followed by a chapter number. You may wish to consult T 2, and T 3 as refreshers.
|
Week |
|
|
|
Week 2 |
|
Orientation, Syllabus, Final Exam |
|
Week 3 |
|
Overview: Effects of Noise on People, TTS and NIPTS |
|
Week 4 |
|
Noise Exposure and Hearing Loss Prediciton, Federal and State Regulation of Workplace
Noise |
|
Week 5 |
|
Community Regulation of Noise, Workers' Compensation for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss |
|
Week 6 |
|
Sound Measurement in Industry and Community |
|
Week 7 |
|
HCP & Monitoring Audiometry, Personal Hearing Protection Devices |
|
Week 8 |
|
Evaluation of Hearing Conservation Programs; Noise and Speech Communication |
|
Week 9 |
|
Spring Break (Madison) |
Week 10 |
|
Spring Break (Stevens Point) |
|
Week 11 |
|
Audiologist as Expert Witness |
|
Week 12 |
|
Student Presentations 1, 2, 3 & 4 |
|
Week 13 |
|
Student Presentations 5, 6, 7 & 8 |
|
Week 14 |
|
Student Presentations 9, 10, 11, & 12 |
|
Week 15 |
|
Student Presentations 13, 14, 15, & 16 |
|
Week 16 |
|
Student Presentations 17, 18, & 19 |
TECHNICAL STANDARDS RELATED TO AUDIOLOGIC PRACTICE
Note: for ANSI documents, "R" means "reaffirmed."
As of January, 2006
ANSI S1 Acoustics |
Noise and Hearing
(as of about 1996)
AAO-ACO [1979]. Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing handicap. J Am Med Assoc 241: 2056-2079
AAO-HNS [1983]. Otologic referral criteria for occupational hearing conservation programs. Washington, D.C.: American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.
ACGIH [1995]. 1995-1996 Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
AIHA [1991]. A strategy for occupational exposure assessment. Akron, OH: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
Alberti PW (Ed.) (1982]. Personal hearing protection in industry. New York, NY: Raven Press.
Amos NE, and Simpson, TH (1995]. Effects of pre-existing hearing loss and gender on proposed ANSI S12.13 Outcomes for characterising hearing conservation program effectiveness: Preliminary investigation. J Am Acad Audiology 6:407-413.
AOMA [1987]. Guidelines for the conduct of an occupational hearing conservation program. J Occup Med 29(12):981-982.
ASHA [1981]. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Task Force on the Definition of Hearing Handicap. On the definition of hearing handicap. Asha 23: 293-297.
ASHA [1992]. A survey of states' workers' compensation practices for occupational hearing loss. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Aniansson G [1974]. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in everyday listening situations. Acta Otol, Suppl 320.
Atherley G, Johnston N. [1981]. Audiometry--the ultimate test of success? Ann Occup Hyg 4:427-447.
Atherley GRC [1973]. Noise-induced hearing loss: The energy principle for recurrent impact noise and noise exposure close to the recommended limits. Ann Occup Hyg 16:183-193.
Atherley GRC, Martin AM [1971]. Equivalent-continuous noise level as a measure of injury from impact and impulse noise. Ann Occup Hyg 14:11-28.
Axlesson A, Borchgrevink H, Hamernik RP, Hellstrom P, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, (Eds.), [1996]. Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
Bauer P, Korpert K, Neuberger M, Raber A, Schwetz F [1991]. Risk factors for hearing loss at different frequencies in a population of 47,388 noise-exposed workers. J Acoust Soc Am 90(6):3086-3098.
Behar A [1985]. Field evaluation of hearing protectors. Noise Control Engineering Journal 24(1):13-18.
Behar A, Plenar R [1984]. Noise exposure--sampling strategy and risk assessment. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 45:105-109.
Belli S, Sri L, Scarficcia G, Sorrentino R [1984]. Arterial hypertension and noise: A cross-sectional study. Am J Ind Med 6:59-65.
Berger EH [1979-1993]. EARLog monographs (downloadable
from (http://www.cabotsafety.com/html/industrial/earlog.htm
). Indianapolis, IN: Cabot Safety Corporation.
- The threshold shift method of measuring hearing protector attenuation (1979).
- Single number measures of hearing protector noise reduction (1979).
- The effects of hearing protectors on auditory communications (1980).
- The perfromance of hearing protectors in industrial noise environments (1980).
- Hearing protector performance: how they work and what goes wrong in the real world (1980).
- Extra-auditory benefits of a hearing conservation program (1981).
- Motivating employees to wear hearing protective devices (1981).
- Responses to questions and complaints regarding hearing and hearing protection (Part II) (1982).
- Responses to questions and complaints regarding hearing and hearing protection (Part III) (1983).
- The hearing conservation amendment (Part I) (1983).
- The hearing conservation amendment (Part II) (1984).
- Attenuation of earplugs worn in combination with earmuffs (1984).
- Protection for infrasonic and ultrasonic noise exposure (1984).
- Workers' compensation for occupational hearing loss (1985).
- A new hearing protection attenuation standard - ANSI S12.6 (1985).
- Ear infection and the use of hearing protection (1985).
- Can hearing aids provide hearing protection? (1987).
- Tips for fitting hearing protectors (1988).
- The naked truth about NRRs (1993).
Berger EH, Kieper RW [1991]. Measurement of the real-world attenuation of E-A-R Foam and UltraFit brand earplugs on production employees. Indianapollis, IN: Cabot Safety Corporation, Report No. E-A-R 91-30/HP.
Berger EH, Ward WD, Morrill JC, Royster LH [1986]. Noise & hearing conservation manual. Akron, OH: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
Bies DA, Hansen CH [1990]. An alternative mathematical description of the relationship between noise exposure and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 88(6): 2743-2754.
Boettcher F, Henderson D, Gratton M, Danielson R, Byrne C [1987]. Synergistic interactions of noise and other ototraumatic agents. Ear and Hearing 8:192-212.
Bohne BA, Pearse MS [1982]. Cochlear damage from daily exposure to low-frequency noise. Unpublished manuscript. St. Louis, MO: Washington University Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology.
Bohne BA, Yohman L, Gruner MM [1987]. Cochlear damage following interrupted exposure to high-frequency noise. Hearing Res 29:251-264.
Bohne BA, Zahn SJ, Bozzay DG [1985]. Damage to the cochlea following interrupted exposure to low frequency noise. Ann Otol, Rhinol & Laryngol 94:122-128.
Botsford JH [1967]. Simple method for identifying acceptable noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 42:810-819.
Brant LJ, Fozard JL [1990]. Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal humna aging. J Acoust Soc Am 88(2):813-820.
Broadbent DE [1980]. Noise in relation to annoyance, performance, and mental health. J Acoust Soc Am 68:15-17.
Brown J, Brummett R, Fox K [1980]. Combined effects of noise and kanamycin. Cochlear pathology and pharmacology. Arch Otolaryngol 106:744-750.
Brown J, Brummett R, Meikle M, Vernon J [1978]. Combined effects of noise and neomycin: Cochlear changes in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol 86:394-400.
Buchta E [1990]. A field survey on annoyance cuased by sounds from small firearms. J Acoust Soc Am 88(3): 1459-1467.
Burns W. [1973]. Noise and man. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Company.
Burns W, Robinson DW [1970]. Hearing and noise in industry. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Byrne D, Monk W [1993]. Evaluating a hearing conservation program: a comparison of the USAEHA method and the ANSI S12.13 method [Abstract]. Spectrum 10 (Suppl 1):19.
CHABA [1968]. Proposed damage-risk criterion for impulse noise. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council's Committee on Hearing, Bio-acoustics and Biomechanics.
CSA [1986]. Procedures for the measurement of occupational noise exposure, a national standard of Canada. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Standards Association.
Casali JG, Park M [1991]. Laboratory versus field attenuation of selected hearing protectors. Sound and Vibration 25(10):26-38.
Ceypek TKJ, Kuzniarz JJ, Lipowczan [1973]. Hearing loss due to impulse noise - A field study. Proceedings of the International Congress on noise as a public health problem, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Chung DY, Hardie R, Gannon RP [1983]. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry. J Occup Med 15(9):679-682.
Clark WW, Bohne BA [1978]. Animal model for the 4 kHz tonal dip. Ann Otol, Rhinol & Laryngol 51(87)(Suppl):1-16.
Clark WW, Bohne BA [1986]. Cochlear damage: audiometric correlates? In: Collins MJ, Glattke T, Harker LA, (Eds.). Sensorineural hearing loss: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.
Clark WW, Bohne BA, Boettcher FA [1987]. Effect of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise. J Acoust Soc Am 82:1253-1264.
Cohen A [1973]. Extra-auditory effects of occupational noise Part II: Effects on work performance. National Safety News 108:68-76.
Cohen A [1976]. The influence of a company hearing conservation program on extra-auditory problems in workers. J Saf Res 8(4):146-162.
Coles RR [1980]. Effects of impulse noise on hearing--introduction. Scand Audiology Suppl 12:11-13.
Coles RR, Rice CG, Martin AM [1973]. Noise-induced hearing loss from impulse noise: present status. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May 13-18, 1973. Washington DC: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Pub No. 550/9-73-008.
Coles RR, Garinther GR, Hodge DC, Rice CG [1968]. Hazardous exposure to impulse noise. J Acoust Soc Am 43:336-346.
Danielson R, Henderson D, Gratton MA, Bianchi L, Salvi R [1991]. The importance of "temporal pattern" in traumatic impulse noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 90:209&endash;218.
Dancer AL, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, Hammernik RP (Eds.), (1992]. Noise-induced hearing loss. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book.
Delin C [1984]. Noisy work and hypertension. Lancet 2:931.
Dibble K [1995]. Hearing loss & music. J Audio Eng Soc 43(4):251-266.
Dobie RA [1994]. Medical-legal evaluation of hearing loss. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Dobie, RA [1992]. The relative contribtutios of occupational noise and aging in individual cases of hearing loss. Ear and Hearing 13(1):19-27.
Dufresne, RM, Alleyne, BC, Reesal, MR [1988]. Asymmetric hearing loss in truck drivers. Ear and Hearing 9(1):41-42.
EPA [1973]. Public health and welfare criteria for noise. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report 550/9-73-002.
EPA [1974]. Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report 550/9-74-004.
Edwards RG, Green WW [1987]. Effect of an improved hearing conservation program on earplug performance in the workplace. Noise Control Engineering J 28(2):55-90.
Edwards RG, Hauser, WP, Molseev NA, Broderson AB, Green WW [1978]. Effectiveness of earplugs as worn in the workplace. Sound and Vibration 12(1):12-42.
Eldred KM, Gannon WJ, von Gierke HE [1955]. Criteria for short time exposure of personnel to high intensity jet aircraft noise. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: U.S. Air Force, WADC Technical Note 55-355.
33 Fed. Reg. 14,258 [1968]. Bureau of Labor Standards. Proposed rule making: occupational noise exposure.
34 Fed. Reg. 790 [1969a]. Bureau of Labor Standards. Occupational noise exposure.
34 Fed. Reg. 7,948 [1969b]. Bureau of Labor Standards. Occupational noise exposure.
39 Fed. Reg. 37,773 [1974a]. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational noise exposure: proposed requirements and procedures. (Codified at 29 CFR 1910.)
39 Fed. Reg. 43,802 [1974b]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Proposed OSHA occupational noise exposure regulation: request for review and report.
40 Fed. Reg. 12,336 [1975]. Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Occupational noise exposure--review and report requested by EPA.
46 Fed. Reg. 4,078 [1981]. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational noise exposure; hearing conservation amendment: final rule. (Codified at 29 CFR 1910.)
48 Fed. Reg. 9,738 [1983]. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational noise exposure; hearing conservation amendment: final rule. (Codified at 29 CFR 1910.)
Fechter LD, Young JY, Carlisle L [1988]. Potentiation of noise induced threshold shifts and hair cell loss. Hearing Research 34:39-48.
Feldman AS, Grimes CT (Eds.), [1985]. Hearing conservation in industry. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Fidel, S, Barber, DS, Schultz, TJ (1991). Uipdating a dosage-effect relationshisp for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportaion noise. J Acoust Soc Am 89(1): 221-233.
Fidell S, Pearsons K, Tabachnick, Howe R, Silvati, L, Barber, DS (1995). Field study of noise-induyced sleep disturbance. J Acoust Soc Am 98(2): 1025-33.
Fleming RM [1980]. A new procedure for field testing of earplugs for occupational noise reduction [dissertation]. Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health.
Franks JR, Berger EH [1997]. Hearing protection - personal protection - overview and philosophy of personal protection. In: ILO Encyclopaedia of occupational safety and health. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization. (in press)
Franks JR, Davis RR, Krieg EF [1989]. Analysis of a hearing conservation program database: factors other than workplace noise. Ear & Hearing 10(5):273-280.
Franks JR, Stephenson MR, Merry, CJ (Eds.) [1996]. Preventing occupational hearing loss--a practical guide. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 96-110.
von Gierke HE, Robinson D, Karmy SJ [1981]. Results of the workshop on impulse noise and auditory hazard. Southampton, England: University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, ISVR Memorandum 618.
Gannon RP, Tso SS, Chung DY [1979]. Interaction of kanamycin and noise exposure. J Laryngol Otol 93:341-347.
Gasaway DC [1985]. Documentation: the weak link in audiometric monitoring programs. Occup Health & Saf 54(1):28-33.
Glorig A, Ward WD, Nixon J [1961]. Damage risk criteria and noise-induced hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol 74:413-423.
Goff RJ, Blank WJ [1984]. A field of evaluation of muff-type hearing protection devices. Sound and Vibration 18(10):16-22.
Guberan E, Fernandez J, Cardinet J, Terrier G [1971]. Hazardous exposure to industrial impact noise. Ann Occup Hyg 14:345-350.
Haag WM [1988]. Engineering source controls can reduce worker exposure to noise. Occup Health & Safety 57(4):31-33.
Hachey GA, Roberts JT [1983]. Real world effectiveness of hearing protection. Unpublished paper presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference, Philadelphia, PA, May 1983.
Hammerkik R, Ahroon WA, Hsueh KD, Lei SF, Davis RI [1993]. Audiometric and histological differences between the effects of continuous and impulsive noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 93(4):2088-2095.
Hamernik R, Henderson D, Coling D, Salvi R [1981]. Influence of vibration on asymptotic threshold shift produced by impulse noise. Audiology 20:259-269.
Hamernik R, Henderson D, Coling D, Slepecky N [1980]. The interaction of whole body vibration and impulse noise. J Acoust Soc Am 68:928-934.
Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi R, (Eds.), [1982]. New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Raven Press.
Hammernik, RP, Ahroon WA, Davis RI, Lei SF (1994). Hearing thrreshold shifts from repeated 6-h daily expose to impact noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95(1): 444-453.
Harris CM (Ed.), [1991]. Handbook of acoustical measurements and noise control., 3rd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Harris CM (Ed.), [1993]. Noise control in buildings. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Helmkamp JC, Talbott EO, Margolis H [1984]. Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss characteristics of a blue-collar population. J Occup Med 26:885-891.
Helmkamp JC [1986]. Why workers do not use hearing protection. Occ Health and Safety 55(10):52.
Hempstock TI, Hill E [1990]. The attenuations of some hearing protectors as used in the workplace. Ann Occup Hyg 34:453-470.
Henderson D, Hamernik R [1986]. Impulse noise: Critical review. J Acoust Soc Am 80:569-584.
Henderson D, Hamernik R, Dosanjh D, Mills J, (Eds.), [1976]. Effects of noise on hearing. New York, NY: Raven Press.
Henderson D, Subramaniam M, and Boettcher FA [1993]. Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss: An old topic revisited. Ear & Hearing 14(3): 152-168.
Henderson D, Subramaniam M, Gratton, MA, Saunders SS [1991]. Impact noise: The importance of level, duration and repetition rate. J Acoust Soc Am 89(3):1350&endash;1357.
Henselman LW, Henderson D, Shadoan J, Subramaniam M, Saunders S, and Ohlin D [1995]. Effects of noise exposure, race and years of service on hearing in U.S. Army soldiers. Ear & Hearing 16(4): 382-391.
Henry SD [1992]. Characterizing TWA noise exposures using statistical analysis and normality. Unpublished paper presented at the Hearing Conservation Conference, Cincinnati, OH, April 3, 1992.
Hetu R [1979]. Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss. J Occup Med 21:251-254.
Humes L [1984]. Noise-induced hearing loss as influenced by other agents and by some physical characteristics of the individual. J Acoust Soc Am 76:1318-1329.
Jackson-Oman PA, Wynne MK, Kasten RN [1994]. Prediction of 8-hour noise dose from brief duration samples. J Am Acad Audiology 5:402-411.
Johansson B, Kylin B, Reopstorff S [1973]. Evaluation of the hearing damage risk from intermittent noise according to the ISO recommendations. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a public health problem. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report 550/9-73-008.
Johnson A, Juntunen L, Nylen P, Borg E, Hoglund G [1988]. Effect of interaction between noise and toluene on auditory function in the rat. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 105:56-63.
Jonsson A, Hansson L [1977]. Prolonged exposure to a stressful stimulus (noise) as a cause of raised blood pressure in man. Lancet 1:86-87.
Krammer, MB, Armbruster JM (1982). Forensic audiology. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Kryter KD [1998]. Evaluation of hearing handicap. J Am Acad Audiol 9: 141-146.
Kryter KD [1983]. Presbycusis, sociocusis, and nosocusis. J Acoust Soc Am 73: 1897-1917.
Kryter, KD [1970]. The effects of noise on man. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Kryter KD, Ward WD, Miller JD, Eldredge DH [1966]. Hazardous exposure to intermittent and steady-state noise. J Acoust Soc Am 39:451&endash;464.
Kuzniarz JJ [1973]. Hearing loss and speech intelligibility in noise. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report No. 550/9-73-008.
Lempert BL [1984]. Compendium of hearing protection devices. Sound and Vibration 18(5):26-39.
Lempert BL, Edwards RG [1983]. Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 44:894-902.
Lempert BL, Henderson TL [1973]. Occupational noise and hearing 1968 to 1972: A NIOSH study. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Lees REM, Roberts JH [1979]. Noise-induced hearing loss and blood pressure. CMA Journal 120:1082-1084.
Lipscomb DM (Ed.), [1978]. Noise and audiology. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Lipscomb DM, Taylor AC (Eds.), [1978]. Noise control: Handbook of principles and practices. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Lipscomb, DM (Ed.), [1994]. Hearing conservation in industry, schools and the military. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
Macrae JH [1994]. Prediction of asymptotic threshold shift caused by hearing aid us. J Speech Hearing Res 37:1450-1458.
Malchaire JB, Mullier M [1979]. Occupational exposure to noise and hypertension: A retrospective study. Ann Occup Hyg 22:63-66.
Manninen O, Aro S [1979]. Noise-induced hearing loss and blood pressure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 42:251-256.
Melnick W [1984]. Evaluation of industrial hearing conservation programs: a review and analysis. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 45(7):59-67.
Mendez AM, Salazar EB, Bontti HG [1986]. Attenuation measurements of hearing protectors in workplace. Argentina: Laboratorio de Acustica y Luminotecnia C.I.C.
Miller JD [1974]. Effects of noise on people. J Acoust Soc Am 56:729-764.
Miller MH [1981]. Occupational hearing conservation: State of the art. Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, 3 (1).
Miller MH, and Silverman LA (Eds.), [1984]. Occupational hearing conservation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mills JH [1975]. Noise and children. J Acoust Soc Am 58:767-779.
Morata TC, and Dunn DE (Eds.) (19xx). Occupational hearing loss. Occup Med: State of the Art Rev 10(3):495-689.
Morata TC, Dunn DE, Kretschmer LW, Lemasters GK, Keith RW [1993]. Effects of occupational exposure to organic solvents and noise on hearing. Scand J Work Environ Health 19(4):245-254.
Morrell CH, Gordon-Salant S, Pearson JD, Brant, LJ, Fozard JL [1996]. Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level. J Acoust Soc Am 100 (4):1949-1967.
Morrill JC [1986]. Hearing measurement. In: Berger EH, Ward WD, Morrill JC, Royster LH, eds. Noise and hearing conservation manual. Akron, OH: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
Morrill JC, Sterrett ML [1981]. Quality controls for audiometric testing. Occup Health & Saf 50(8):26-33.
NCHS [1993]. Vital and health statistics: health conditions among the currently employed, United States, 1988. Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Center for Helath Statistics, DHHS (PHS) Publication No. 93-1514.
NHCA [1987]. Occupational hearing conservationist training guidelines. Des Moines, IA: National Hearing Conservation Association.
NIOSH [1972]. Criteria for a recommended standard: occupational exposure to noise. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. HSM 73-llOOl.
NIOSH [1973]. The industrial environment - its evaluation and control. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHEW (NIOSH), pp. 533-562.
NIOSH [1975]. Compendium of materials for noise control. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 75-165.
NIOSH [1976]. Survey of hearing loss in the coal mining industry. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 76-172.
NIOSH [1977]. Occupational exposure sampling strategy manual. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHEW(NIOSH) Publication No. 77-173.
NIOSH [1978]. The Standards Completion Program draft technical standards analysis and decision logics. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NTIS No. PB-282 989.
NIOSH [1982]. Hazard evaluation and technical assistance report: Newburgh Fire Department. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH Report No. HETA 81-059-1045.
NIOSH [1994]. The NIOSH compendium of hearing protective devices. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 95-105.
NIOSH [1995]. Preventing occupational hearing loss - A practical guide. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 96-110.
Nilsson R, Liden G, Sanden A [1977]. Noise exposure and hearing impairment in the shipbuilding industry. Scand Audiology 6:59-68.
Noweir MH [1984]. Noise exposure as related to productivity, disciplinary actions, absenteeism, and accidents among textile workers. J Saf Res 15(4):163-174.
OSHA [1989]. Industrial hygiene field operation manual. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA Instruction CPL 2.45B.
Ohrstrom E, Martin B, Rylander R [1988]. Noise annoyance with regard to neurophysiological sensitivity, subjective noise sensitivity and personality variables. Psychological Medicine 18:605-613.
Olishifski PE, Harford ER [1975]. Industrial noise and hearing convservation. Chicago, IL: National Safety Council.
PHS [1991]. Healthy People 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 91-50212, p. 588.
Padilla M [1976]. Ear plug performance in industrial field conditions. Sound and Vibration 10(5):33-36.
Parvizpoor D [1976]. Noise exposure and prevalence of high blood pressure among weavers in Iran. J Occup Med 18:730-731.
Passchier-Vermeer W [1968]. Hearing loss due to exposure to steady-state broadband noise. Delft, Netherlands: Research Institute for Public Health Engineering, Report 35.
Passchier-Vermeer W [1973]. Noise-induced hearing loss from exposure to intermittent and varying noise. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on noise as a public health problem. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report 550/9-73-008.
Pearsons KS, Barber, DS, Tabachnick BG, Fidell, S (1995). Predicting nopise-induced sleep disturbance. J Acoust Soc Am 97(6): 331-338.
Pekkarinen J) [1987]. Industrial impulse noise, crest factor and the effects of earmuffs. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 48 (10):861-866.
Pekkarinen JO [1989]. Exposure to impulse noise, hearing protection and combined risk factors in the development of sensory neural hearing loss. Kuopio, Finland: University of Kuopio.
Pekkarinen, JO, Stark, JP. Ylikoski, JS ( 1992). Heating protection against high-level shooting impulses in relation to hearing damage risk criteria. J Acoust Soc Am 91(1): 196-202.
Pell S [1972]. An evaluation of a hearing conservation program. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 33(1):60-70.
Pfeiffer BH, Kuhn HD, Specht U, Knipfer C [1989]. Sound attenuation by hearing protectors in the real world. Sankt Augustin, Germany: Berufsgenossenschaftliches Institut fur Arbeitssicherheit, BIA Report 5/89.
Price GR, Kalb JT [1991]. Insights into hazards from intense impulses from a mathematical model of the ear. J Acoust Soc Am 90:219-227.
Punch JL, Robinson DO, Katt DF [1996]. Development of a hearing performance standard for law enforecement officers. J Am Acad Audiology 7:113-119.
Rebert CS, Sorenson SS, Howd RA, Pryor GT [1983]. Toluene-induced hearing loss in rats evidenced by the brainstem auditory-evoked response. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 5:59-62.
Regan DE [1975]. Real ear attenuation of personal ear protective devices worn in industry. Doctoral thesis at Kent State University. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms Int.
Rink T [1989]. Clinical review of patterns from 300,000 industrial audiograms. Paper presented at the 1989 Industrial Hearing Conservation Conference, April 12-14, 1989, Lexington, KY.
Rintlemann WF, Borus QF [1968]. Noise-induced hearing loss and rock & roll music. Arch Otolaryngol 88:377-385.
Robinson, DW [1991]. Long term repeatability of the pure-tone hearing threshold and its relation to noise exposure. Br J Audiology 25:219-235.
Robinson DW, (Ed.), [1971]. Occupational hearing loss. New York: Academic Press.
Robinson DW [1968]. The relationships between hearing loss and noise exposure. Teddington, England: National Physical Laboratory, NPL Aero Report Ac 32.
Royster JD [1992]. Evaluation of different criteria for significant threshold shift in occupational hearing conservation programs. Raleigh, NC: Environmental Noise Consultants, Inc., NTIS No. PB93-159143.
Royster JD, Royster LH [1990]. Hearing conservation programs: Practical guidelines for success. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.
Royster JD, Berger EH, Merry CJ, Nixon CW, Franks JR, Behar A, Casali JG, Dixon-Ernst C, Kieper RW, Mozo BT, Ohlin D, Royster LH [1996]. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Commitee S12 Noise. J Acoust Soc Am 99:1506-1521
Royster LH, Royster JD, Gecich TF [1984]. Evaluation of the effectiveness of three hearing protective devices at an industrial facility with a TWA of 107 dB. J Acoust Soc Am 76(2):485-497.
Rybak LP [1992]. Hearing: the effects of chemicals. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 106:677-686.
Sataloff J, Vassallo L, Menduke H [1969]. Hearing loss from exposure to interrupted noise. Arch Environ Health 18:972-981.
Schmidek M, Margolis B, Henderson TL [1975]. Effects of the level of noise interruptions on temporary threshold shift. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 36:351-357.
Schmiedt RA [1984]. Acoustic injury and the physioology of hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 76:1293-1217.
Shaw EAG [1985]. Occupational noise exposure and noise-induced hearing loss: scientific issues, technical arguments and practical recommendations. APS 707. Report prepared for the Special Advisory Committee on the Ontario Noise Regulation. NRCC/CNRC No. 25051. National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada.
Shotland LI [1996]. Dosimetry measurements using a probe tube microphone in the ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am 99(2):979-984.
Simpson TH, Berninger S [1992]. Comparison of short- and long-term sampling strategies for fractional assessment of noise exposure. Unpublished paper presented at the Hearing Conservation Conference, Cincinnati, OH, April 3, 1992.
Simpson TH, Stewart M, Kaltenback JA [1994]. Early indicators of hearing conservation program performance. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 5:300-306.
Singh AP, Rai RM, Bhatia MR, Nayar HS [1982]. Effect of chronic and acute exposure to noise on physiological functions in man. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 50:169-174.
Smoorenburg GF, Ten Raa BH, Mimpen AM [1986]. Real-world attenuaton of hearing protectors. Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO Institute for Perception.
Starck J, Pekkarinen J [1987]. Industrial impulse noise: Crest factor as an additional parameter in exposure measurements. Applied Acoustics 20:263-274.
Starck J, Pekkarinen J, Pyykko I [1988]. Impulse noise and hand-arm vibration in relation to sensory neural hearing loss. Scand J Work Environ Health 14:265-271.
Sulkowski WJ, Lipowczan A [1982]. Impulse noise-induced hearing loss in drop forge operators and the energy concept. Noise Control Eng 18:24-29.
Suter AH [1978]. The ability of mildly hearing-impaired individuals to discriminate speech in noise. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report No. 550/9-78-100.
Suter AH [1986]. Hearing conservation. In: Berger EH, Morrill JC, Ward WD, Royster LH, eds. Noise and hearing conservation manual. Akron, OH: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
Suter AH (1993). Hearing conservation maual, 3rd Ed. Milwaukee, WI: Council for Accreditation in Occupational Hearing Conservation.
Suter AH [1989]. The effects of noise on performance. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory. Technical Memorandum 3-89.
Suter AH [1989]. The need for and benfits of audiometric data base analysis. Sound and Vibration 23(12):14-16.
Suter AH [1992a]. The relationship of the exchange rate to noise-induced hearing loss. Cincinnati, OH: Alice Suter and Associates, NTIS No. PB93-118610.
Suter AH [1992b]. Communication and job performance in noise: a review. ASHA Monographs, No. 28. Rockville, Maryland: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Takala J, Varke S, Vaheri E, Sievers K. Noise and blood pressure. Lancet 1:974-975.
Talbott E, Findlay R, Kuller L, Lenkner L, Matthews K, Day R, Ishii E. [1990]. Noise-induced hearing loss: A possible marker for high blood pressure in older noise-exposed populations. J Occup Med 32:685-689.
Talbott E, Helmkamp J, Matthews K, Kuller L, Cottington E, Redmond G [1985]. Occupational noise exposure, noise-induced hearing loss and the epidemiology of high blood pressure. Am J Epidemiol 121:501-514.
Taylor W, Pelmear PL [1976]. Noise levels and hearing thresholds in the drop forging industry. Medical Research Council project report, June 1976, Grant G972/784/C. London, England: Medical Research Council.
Taylor W, Peterson J, Mair A [1969]. Study of noise and hearing in jute weaving. J Acoust Soc Am 38:113-120.
Taylor SM, Lempert B, Pelmear P, Hemstock I, Kershaw J [1984]. Noise levels and hearing thresholds in the drop forging industry. J Acoust Soc Am 76(3):807-819.
Taylor SM [1984]. A path model of aircraft noise annoyance. Sound and Vibration 96:243-260.
Teder H [1990]. Noise and speech levels in noisy environments. Hearing Instruments 41 (4):32-33.
Thiery L, Meyer-Bisch C [1988]. Hearing loss due to partly impulsive industrial noise exposure at levels between 87 and 90 dB(A). J Acoust Soc Am 84:651-659.
U.S. Air Force [1956]. Hazardous noise exposure. Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force, Office of the Surgeon General, AF Regulation 160-3.
U.S. Air Force [1993]. Hazardous noise program. Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force, AFOSH Standard 48-19.
U.S. Army [1994]. Army hearing conservation program policy. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Memorandum dated 24 June 1994.
Verbeek JHAM, van Dijk FJH, de Vries FF [1987]. Non-auditory effects of noise in industry: IV. A field study on industrial noise and blood pressure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 59:51-54.
Ward WD [1970]. Temporary threshold shift and damage risk criteria for intermittent noise exposures. J Acoust Soc Am 48:561-574.
Ward WD [1980]. Noise-induced hearing loss: research since 1973. In: Tobias JV, Jansen G, Ward WD, eds. Proceedings of the Third International Congress on noise as a public health problem. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language Hearing Assoc, ASHA Report 10.
Ward WD, Turner CW, Fabry DA [1982]. Intermittence and the total energy hypothesis. Paper presented at the 104th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America.
Ward WD, Turner CW, Fabry DA [1983]. The total-energy and equal-energy principles in the chinchilla. Poster contribution to the Fourth International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Turin, Italy.
West PDB, Evans EF [1990]. Detection of hearing damage in young listeners resulting from exposure to amplified music. Br J Audiology 24:89-103
Wilkins PA, Action WI [1982]. Noise and accidents--a review. Ann Occup Hyg 25:249-260.
Wilson CE [1994]. Noise control: Measurement, analysis, and control of sound and vibration. Melbourne, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
Wisconsin, State of [1994]. Wisconsin Administrative Code Chapter Ind 80-Section 25; Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 102-Section 555
Wu TN, Ko YC, Chang PY [1987]. Study of noise exposure and high blood pressure in shipyard workers. Am J Ind Med 12:431-438.
Yanz JL, and Abbas PJ [1982]. Age effects in susceptibility to noise induced-hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 72(5): 1450-1455.
Young SY, Upchurch MB, Kaufman MJ, Fechter LD [1987]. Carbon monoxide exposure potentiates high-frequency auditory threshold shifts induced by noise. Hearing Research 26:37-43.